Recent Posts
- My Experience With Glass Burning Fireboxes
- How Much Does a Big Box Really Sell?
- Don't Let The Sky Fall On You
- Click or Brick, Part 2
- Click or Brick
- Here's What Wow'ed Me At Market
- Hurricane Ike
- Is It Really Market Time Again?!!!
- Are You Prepared For A Disaster
- Hurricane Gustav Blog, H + 2, 3, and 4
Recent Comments
- Brian on Hurricane Gustav Blog, Day 2
- raj on Is China the answer for us?
- acitippibia on Is China the answer for us?
- Rasiarinisida on Is China the answer for us?
- Exhaumefamfen on Is China the answer for us?
Most Commented On
- Is China the answer for us? (17)
- Credit Card Quandry (6)
- Building Partnerships with Manufacturers, How Passe (2)
- Here's What Wow'ed Me At Market (2)
- Where or Where Woodard? (2)
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
Blog
Is China the answer for us?
October 23, 2007
Two years ago, I brought in a container of Woodard chinese wrought iron. I was surprised by the exceptional quality of the product since the chairs cost me ony $27. Freight which was about 50% of the value of the container bringing the total cost of a chair to about $40. I was able to sell a dining set for $399. Boy, did I think I did good! So did my customers; the product sold like hotcakes.But after a couple of months, I noticed several things. First, my American-made wrought iron sales slumped. The year before I was selling a four piece set of wrought iron for $699 with no problem. I had to sell almost twice as many of the Chinese sets to make the same profit. Second, my delivery system was getting clogged with these sets. Instead of delivering four sets worth over $2,000 each a day, I was delivering four sets worth $400 each a day. My margin on this furniture was much less than I anticipated.
Why am I telling you this? Because manufacturers' are realizing the same thing is happening to them when they try to supplement their domestic line with less expensive off-shore products. Manufacturers see an oppportunity to bring in the cheap, but high quality, products being created in China. But, retailers who bring in the product can't do custom orders from China. So, the manufacturer, sees their U. S. production facility as the way to fulfill those custom orders. Seems like a great deal for a retailer, bring in containers of value priced merchandise for your warehouse, but use the U. S. production facility to fullfill your cusom orders.
Sounds good but is it really? Early buy plans exist so that manufacturers can keep their production lines busy during the off-season. They also exist so that importers can schedule their containers to be sure they get here before the season starts. Both plans are revealed at the premarket or regular market. If a vendor goes to market with a viable container program, they hope to sell as many containers as they can at those markets. If they have a domestic plant, they also hope they can sell enough of that product to keep their production lines busy here.
Step in the retailer. Large, multistore retailers will take advantage of the less expensive container program. Many of them don't offer or want a custom order program; so, the most of their early buy orders will be just for containers. That doesn't keep the U. S. factory busy! Some smaller retailers might be able to take advantage of these container programs. If they do, they usually have to reduce the size of their domestic early buy. That doesn't keep the U. S. factory busy! And then there are the retailers that can't take advantage of the container programs at all. They cant help fulfill the offshore manufacturer's requirements for big numbers and their orders are usually too small to keep the U. S. facility busy!
All of the sudden, the manufacturer sees big numbers in their lower cost container program, but their domestic program goes into a slump. They still have the costs of their U. S. infrastructure (reps, clerical, production, etc.) and now their margins are lower even though they are selling more units. The manufacturer will have to reevaluate the viability of their U. S. production facilities or their container programs. My guess is they will go with the container programs because the numbers are so big. If they do, they will become more dependent on large multi-store operations, leaving the independent specialty store with one less supplier.
Have you experienced this? If so, how have you addressed it? I would like to hear your thoughts on this, whether you are a retailer, rep, or manufacturer. IMHO, this is the cause of many of the problems at the core of our industry.
Yours in confused retailing, Bruce
Posted by Bruce Aronson on October 23, 2007 | Comments (17)
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Brent Ford commented:
Bruce, I am the National Sales Director from Kaven Co. a Chinese manufacturer. Why not work with a company that not only sells containers from China but also warehouses in the states. You can take advantage of great prices but also offer custom orders through the warehouse with different colors and cushions.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Bruce Aronson commented:
Dear Brent, I wasn't referring to vendors like you. There are some successful vendors who have container programs with warehousing in the U. S. to help with custom orders. Ebel, Inc. and Summer Classic come to mind. Instead, I was talking about vendors with factories in the U. S. that are trying to supplement their business by bringing in off-shore goods (not parts). Just seems very hard to be fish and fowl.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
cqkgjytmwg commented:
cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Bob commented:
Hello. Here I have found a lot of useful to myself.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
John commented:
Keep working on it.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Mister commented:
Keep up the good work.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
John commented:
SENSATIONAL!
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Guruchel commented:
That’s the way to do it.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Rick commented:
It’s such a pleasure to teach when you
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
A Kenan commented:
How can I import some goods from China . What are the costs and how long does it take? where do I go to find this information? bogardz@gmail.com
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
WHAT commented:
Importing anything from China is a bad idea. Quality sucks it is killing us business. Just wait untill Wal-mart is the only business on your main street that will be great keep on supporting. You will think of me every time you have to replace everything in your home every two to three years because nothing last.
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
国際結婚 commented:
ã¯ã„。
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Lohness commented:
well... really good post!
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Exhaumefamfen commented:
army asian mature models asian girls giving head
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
Rasiarinisida commented:
rakisuta youtube sail boats muscled guys
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
acitippibia commented:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. says it will modify the terms of $70 billion in troubled, mostly adjustable-rate mortgages it holds. The New York bank inherited many of the loans as part of its September purchase of a failed competitor, Washington Mutual Inc. (NYSE:WM), and its move will cover as many as 400,000 borrowers. J.P. Morgan said Friday the borrowers will be moved into loans carrying lower interest rates, smaller principal amounts or other more-affordable terms, The Wall Street Journal reported. The move came shortly after the bank received a $25 billion capital infusion from the U.S. Treasury's program to strengthen financial institutions and get credit flowing. "Our goal in doing this was to come up with something that we think will lead the industry in helping as much as possible on this issue," said J.P. Morgan executive Charles Scharf. John Taylor, chief executive of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, said the action was "a gutsy move on their part. They are bending over backward to try to reach out to these people."
In response to: Is China the answer for us?
raj commented:
www.search-value.com


